Ron Pulls Ahead

August 18, 2016

The current ratings (of site-position in order of solicitation), according to alexa.com, are:

Ron: 3,325,312

Us: 4,097,301

aias.us: 8,518,438

et3m.net: >30,000,000

upitec.org: >30,000,000

Don’t forget, ‘big is bad’ here. Shouldn’t a company which supposedly sells perpetual-motion machines to Fortune-50 enterprises be more popular than that? And just look at what an expert conman, who does not even have a perpetual-motion machine to sell , can achieve:

searlsolution.com: 1,797,444

 

 

 

That Figures!

August 18, 2016

Contact Information for An Domhnall

August 18, 2016

This is 001 212 832 2000 , Donald Trump, 725 5th Avenue, NY, NY 10022, USA. His attorneys are Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, 11355 West Olympic Boulevard, LA, CA 90064, USA, tel. 001 310 312 4000. In the law of England and Wales, the Court of Appeal in March 2012 ruled that common law injunctions filed for public nuisance over-ride claimed compliance with environmental laws. In the case of Mynydd y Gwair and Betws there is gross violation of environment laws and gross nuisance. There is also violation of human rights laws.”

If one was to have asked oneself, as a theoretical question, what sort of politician Ron would naturally cleave to, the answer was really quite obvious: An Oafish Demagogue!

Sock Puppets

August 17, 2016

Ideotic is not the only crank who is trying to mislead Parliament. Many of the other submissions are from shills of the unspeakable Rossi, who has already served jail-time for ecology-related fraud, or of ‘Blacklight Power’ Mills who conned millions of dollars out of US utility companies. Let us hope that the UK Parliament is not equally stupid.

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31371.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31375.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31386.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31394.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31399.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31404.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31410.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31415.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31426.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31541.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31599.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31645.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/31857.pdf

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/32796.pdf

 

Going Backwards?

August 17, 2016

Higher Order Partial Differential Equation

August 17, 2016

Thanks for this remark. Note 355(4) has boiled things down to a solution of a higher order partial differential equation (6) and a couple of simple equations (5) and (13). The aim should be to find a stable solution for Eq. (6) for realistic boundary conditions. Eq. (6) does not look too terrible and Horst has already found some good solutions.”

Why is it proving so difficult nowadays to fiddle the figures provide theoretical backup for perpetual-motion machines, and why are the devices becoming more unstable? Time was when you and your gang could offer closed-form mathematical explanations for ‘Dr’ Bearden’s Motionless Electromagnetic Generator. It supposedly produced a steady output which was greater than the input. And what about those gadgets that Hill-of-Beans supposedly sells to famous companies out of a Mexican hovel? They must be reliable mustn’t they? How many types of perpetual-motion machine does the world need anyway? We wonder what Kambe thinks of the use to which you are putting his equations. We shall have to ask him.

Who Loves Crothers?

August 17, 2016

Stephen Crothers’ Chapter.

August 17, 2016

Many thanks, I am sure that this is an excellent chapter as usual, and a much needed criticism of meaningless dogma. I am forwarding to Horst to merge into the rest of PECE as chapter nine. Unfortunately my system cannot read this format but I will proof read carefully after it is merged as chapter nine and sent back to me. It is already a very popular book and Stephen is by now world famous.”

Here is a touching story: S.Crothers, aka the Public Defective, is involved in a heart-warming bromance with a hard-rock pop-star,

http://www.gillan.com/friends56.html

And the two of them can discuss physics on an equal level! Who’s your Daddy?

Out of the Woodwork

August 16, 2016

FOR POSTING: Commons Select Committee Accepts Energy from Spacetime (ES)

August 16, 2016

A House of Commons select committee has accepted evidence from Osamu Ide concerning his circuit designs, which take energy from spacetime and UFT311 by Horst Eckardt amd Kurt Arenhold. This source of energy cannot be depleted and the process is completely free of pollution. The Committee has also accepted ECE as a valid theory of physics and new energy engineering.”

Now we are wondering why Ron is so proud of this. A cursory perusal of the other submissions reveals that a considerable number are from other cold-fusion/LENR loonies and conmen. This always happens when an organisation invites suggestions from all-comers. It happened some years ago with the General Electric Ecomagination competition. A very large proportion of the entries proposed classic perpetual motion machines (such as a windmill-on-a-truck which could be driven around if there was no wind!) and silly ‘energy-harvesting’ schemes such as putting wind-turbines in railway tunnels or rollers in roads. Such schemes are not – strictly speaking – contrary to the laws of physics. However, they do not really produce ‘new energy’; they simply purloin energy that somebody else has paid for. Ron’s crooked friend John Searl tried very hard to screw money out of GE. This attempt was seriously impaired by an international group of very nasty skeptics which harried him at every turn. Sounds familiar, Ron? 

A Whole New Chapter!

August 16, 2016

FOR POSTING: Commons Select Committee Accepts Energy from Spacetime (ES)

August 16, 2016

A House of Commons select committee has accepted evidence from Osamu Ide concerning his circuit designs, which take energy from spacetime and UFT311 by Horst Eckardt amd Kurt Arenhold. This source of energy cannot be depleted and the process is completely free of pollution. The Committee has also accepted ECE as a valid theory of physics and new energy engineering. This is a great sea change in attitude which has taken place in the past decade or so, and coincides with a huge amount of international interest in ECE theory. So congratulations to all concerned, and to all staffs of AIAS and UPITEC. Steve Bannister’s excellent Ph. D. Thesis ably describes the revolutionary impact of ES.”

Our author-friend is ‘hoping-against-hope’ that at least some of this may be true. But given the nature of its source, we do not hold out much hope. Nevertheless it would be delightfully embarrassing if the government actually threw money at Ide, in the same way that it threw money at Roger Shawyer and Peter Searl  (John Searl’s brother). Of course, Shawyer’s company is now massively in debt and Searl’s company closed down as soon as it got the £40000 hand-out (the quango which handed it out was then itself closed down … one wonders why).  Ron has certainly learned from his hero (and the hero of all pseudoscientific conmen), Nikola Tesla. Tesla routinely told fantastic lies to journalists … and people today still believe them. So Ron feels quite empowered to tell lies in turn: Bannister makes absolutely no mention of energy from spacetime: if he had done, he would not have got a doctorate, not even in Utah (a state founded on the ‘principles’ of a religious maniac and financial conman). Bannister sometimes mentions space and time in the same sentence, but only in the conventional (separated) sense. He of course mentions ‘energy’ very frequently, but nowhere is there the slightest hint of a belief  in alternative crackpot sources. Did you not in fact read the thesis that you put your name to as a panelist? Or do you really think that you can just say anything, and people will trust you? Still, keep on this Ide governmental track and there is a much-improved chance that you will lose your pension when it all blows up.

Hotting-Up Nicely

August 13, 2016

Summary by Gareth Evans

August 12, 2016″

FOR POSTING: Ph. D. Dissertation of Dr. Stephen Bannister, University of Utah

August 12, 2016″

Excellent! So now our author-friend has a copy of a letter from a former County Council ‘expert’, written to a sitting AM charged with handling energy-matters, which praises all manner of perpetual-motion crackpots and conmen. And, as a bonus, he also has a copy of a letter from an American ‘Professor’ of Economics (albeit one in Utah) which is admiring of an incompetent Japanese ‘engineer’ who has been hawking his supposed ‘over-unity’ device around for over 20 years.  Note the implacable arrogance of these people: they are so deluded (to the point of mental illness in some cases) that they will happily trundle over a precipice, and into a pit of public ridicule, without even noticing. Do they even need a push?

Pièce à conviction … Literally

August 12, 2016

And here is the drivel in question:

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/energy-and-climate-change-committee/energy-revolution/written/32710.pdf

Our opinion is that anyone associated with this deceptive document should be condemned as attempting to perpetrate a fraud on the UK Government and its scientifically naive politicians. 

PS: it is quite informative to go to:

https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/energy-and-climate-change-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/energy-revolution-15-16/publications/

and search for “cold fusion”… or “perpetual motion”

Better and Better!

August 12, 2016

Osamu Ide Submission Accepted

August 12, 2016

Congratulations in turn to Osamu Ide, presumably the Westminster Government has read UFT311, which matches the circuit perfectly with ECE theory. Congress in Washington has been looking in to LENR, so there is progress all round. As a reasonable member of the Government in Wales, Co President Gareth Evans can presumably bring this matter up in the next Clean Air Forum. As a Member of the Gentry and a Bevanite socialist I am not prepared to recognize UKIP, or ever work with it in any way, so I hope that all here can steer clear of them and work for its elimination. As a U. S. citizen I know that Washington is not happy with UKIP because of their far right, destabilizing activities, and not happy with the panicky withdrawal from the European Union. There is a great deal of severe criticism of the Assembly’s fixation with wind turbines.”

Our author-friend hopes very much that this is true about Ideotic; it will help to make his book (about ‘bad physics in high places’) a sure-fire best-seller. He already thought that he was ‘on a winner’ with the UK government’s funding of the fatuous Shawyer Emdrive, not to mention the invitation from the House of Lords to have perpetual-motion conman Stanley Meyer explain to that august body his ‘car that ran on water’ (don’t laugh: that bunch of scientific thickoes once debated the existence of flying-saucers!). But Shawyer’s development company is already essentially bankrupt, and Meyer was indicted for fraud (and then died) before he could make it to the House, so those cases lack immediate currency. How nice it will be to have a new and embarrassing pseudoscientific fiasco brewing around publication time. How delightful it will be to see the only Civil-List Scientist, a ‘scientific adviser’ to a County Council and ‘Gari’ (a sometime government spook) outed as pseudoscientific imbeciles.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.