“As discussed in many well read UFT papers and essays on www.aias.us ”
‘Well read’? Looked at and downloaded, perhaps, but read? Or believed? Nah.
“the geometrical connection is antisymmetric in its lower two indices”
It has been comprehensively shown that Ron cannot handle indices properly:
“this fact is alone sufficient to refute the entire Einsteinian theory.”
What about the prediction of black holes by Newtonian theory? Crothers does not even seem to know whether he is targeting a black hole or a naked singularity.
“Essay 80 and its broadcast by Robert Cheshire lists fifty seven of the numerous refutations available of the entire Einsteinian theory, its basic field equation included.”
Putting nonsense into a different format does not make it any the less nonsensical. And what made a merchant-navy sailor, and tug-boat captain, an authority?
“None of these people debating Stephen Crothers know the first thing about geometry, so they are dogmatists. On a psychological level, paranoid projection is being used, Stephen Crothers being tarred as the epitome of evil, and it is seen that the dogmatists employ gutter personal abuse. ”
Why not post Crothers’ CV and let people see his background?
PS: Hurry up and subscribe; we need those blankets. Doncha just love it when a plan comes together?