Archive for April, 2015

SciTopics, Lest We Forget

April 27, 2015

Some years ago, Elsevier launched SciTopics in order  to showcase new scientific research. Ron obviously thought that this would be a soft target, and posted his usual collection of ECE rubbish:

http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Einstein%20Cartan%20Evans%20Theory%20-%20SciTopics.htm

Unfortunately, there was a whistle-blower in the offing (scroll down to Comments) and Ron was soon beset by mathematical experts. Elsevier finally decided that it was not up to handling nutters, and closed Ron’s page. In fact, this seems to have caused the publisher to shut down SciTopics altogether. Our thanks to Dr Frazier, the whistle-blower, for drawing everyone’s attention to that attempt to promulgate pseudoscience. 

Advertisements

Poor Deluded Ron

April 25, 2015

Number One on Google

April 25, 2015

All 312 UFT items on www.aias.us hit the coveted number one spot on Google and this is indeed a phenomenon, as mentioned by Simon Clifford. Often a UFT item holds the top four or five positions on Google. There are about two hundred Google criteria, the most important are: high quality, a popular page and website, relevance of the keywords. Google has a careful quality control filter which filters out bad websites.”

No, it is not. Try this experiment, Ron: go to an internet-cafe and do the same search. Your UFT sites will come nowhere (unless the cafe happens to be frequented by loonies). What is certainly happening is that Google is choosing the sites that it shows you, based upon its record of the sites which you have previously accessed. The more that you google ‘UFT’, the higher it will get. Meanwhile, Google certainly does not have a quality-filter; even Scholar does not filter out blatant pseudoscience.   

Challenge

April 24, 2015

“In fact all three thousand items on www.aias.us will come up on google in one way or another. All the ECE books and papers and my Omnia Opera papers are in Google Scholar. So if people continue to ignore this impact and still act as if it does not exist, who needs ostriches? To get meaningful results use keywords that are general, but not too general. Knowledge gradually becomes absorbed into the population like ink into blotting paper.”

Of course, Ron does not read our blog (HoHo), but perhaps one of his gang could bring this matter to his attention. Given the overwhelming success (HaHa) of his theory, there must be millions of converts out there just itching to thank him. They obviously cannot manage e-mailing, otherwise he would be flooded daily with correspondence. But why not demonstrate his popularity more directly. So here is the deal, Ron: allow comments to be made on your blog for a period of just 24 hours; we promise that none of us will exploit the opportunity. You would probably cheat by having your gang-members post hundreds of comments each, using numerous aliases, but we are willing to take the risk. Failure to take up this challenge will be interpreted as meaning that you know that the response will not justify your claims.

More Popular Than Pornography?

April 24, 2015

Some More Googling using Genreal Keywords

April 24, 2015

The following results again confirm the impact of ECE and also my earlier work.

1) Keywords Memory Function: “Memory Function Approaches to Stochastic Problems in Condensed Matter on page four out of 1,880,000,000 sites.”

Where are you getting these figures, Ron, or are you inventing them – as you do with the scientometrics? We get 1170 hits for “Memory Function Approaches to Stochastic Problems in Condensed Matter” and 291000 hits for Memory Function Approaches to Stochastic Problems in Condensed Matter. Even ‘pornography’ yields only 101000000 hits. Why do you even imagine that you can get away with such blatant lying?  

Ron’s Millstone

April 24, 2015

“To: emyrone@aol.com

Sent: 23/04/2015 19:46:06 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Nova Program on Hubble Telescope

Dr Evans, Last night, the PBS program NOVA, showed the development of the Hubble telescope. They casually mention dark matter, red shift, big bang, and black holes, like they are proven facts. This kind of embedded propaganda infuriates me. This program was paid for by David Koch (fossil fuel billionaire), who spends millions of dollars each year, keeping the obsolete physics on it’s holy altar. This NOVA program was definitely worth the time to watch, but also, quite upsetting to see the old dogma presented as fact. The program made a point to show, that scientists who follow the mainstream, are rewarded by the Nobel committee.”

So Ron’s Michael Jackson does not believe in the Big Bang, etc. What does he believe in? Well, he thinks that Ron’s theory explains the human soul:

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/8808410/what-is-the-human-soul-and-how-does-it-work

Here is a sample of its content:

No matter what the immediate results of this crop are, earth will eventually reap another harvest of completed souls. In regards to the outcome of this crop, the satanists, in charge of Earth, will never allow mankind to learn the nature of the soul. The satanists have known this secret for centuries, and that is their ONLY strength. The satanists destroy the pineal gland by adding fluoride, and mercury, to water and food, which makes direct soul experience difficult. The satanists do all they can to reduce health, longevity, intelligence, free will, contact with nature, and finding truth and meaning in life.”

This tripe is listed on aias.us, but the link is broken. Could it be that Ron has become embarrassed by its presence? No, that cannot be the case, for why then would he leave this quite unbelievable nonsense on his blog:

https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2014/10/02/radio-interview-on-ece-theory-by-michael-jackson-on-the-jeff-rense-program/

Go to the audio file at the bottom of the post, and listen (especially to Jackson’s take on Einstein [6:44] and Cartan [7:44]).   How does Ron expect anyone to take him seriously? The fact that he did not deny, nor disassociate himself from, these claims when he was later interviewed by Rancid can mean only that he endorses them. So, Ron, tell us more about Cartan the Nazi collaborator …

Never Read It????!!!!!!

April 23, 2015

Famous Last Words

April 23, 2015

“Evans’ work is not worth reading”, written by an anonymous sage in 2011. He dismissed ECE as being not Lorentz covariant and not being based on experiment. Since 2011 it has been read tens of millions of times. This was the result of swallowing the late unlamented Bruhn hook, line and sinker and throwing up all over the internet. This incomparable genius never read ECE as he admits in a show of touching honesty.”

For those unfamiliar with the excellent anti-pseudoscientific efforts of Professor Bruhn, here is the link:

http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/GCUFT.html

Gasp as Bruhn expertly tears Ron’s incorrect mathematics into little pieces in numerous closely-argued papers. As Ron says, ‘an incomparable genius’.

The Sound of a Barrel Being Scraped

April 23, 2015

Some More Google Rankings of ECE Theory

April 23, 2015

These are made with very general keywords, and this gives phenomenal results as described by Simon Clifford. These keywords can be typed in by anyone who has Google Chrome, without enclosing ” “.”

And if one types in Myron Evans, 40% of the first ten hits are anti-Ron. What on Earth are you trying to prove? If moreover you consider your rubbish output to be ‘scientific’ in some way, why are you recommending Google searches, and not Google-Scholar searches? But we know why, don’t we? It is because Scholar clearly shows that nobody cites your post-breakdown work apart from yourself and your gang-members. Is that not rather odd, if your loony theories have supposedly replaced real science?

Mad Evans is Evans-Mad!

April 23, 2015

“This note infers two new identities and collects together the six new identities of all geometry inferred in Notes 313(3) and 313(4). I propose to name these the Bianchi Cartan Evans (BCE) identities, Eqs. (3), (5) and (6), and the Jacobi Cartan Evans (JCE) identities Eqs. (7) to (9). It is already clear that there are going to be many more JCE identities, because the commutator can act on any tensor, not just a vector.”

We propose that Evans should henceforth be appended to every loony theory and to every unfounded or unconfirmed scientific ‘discovery’. It could also be added to the Baez Crackpot Index,

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

Oh … never mind, it has already been added (rule 25, scoring 20 points).

Isn’t That Frightening?

April 22, 2015

Steve Bannister’s Thesis Defense

April 22, 2015

Dr (soon to be) Steve Bannister,
Department of Economics,
University of Utah,
U. S. A.,

Dear Steve,

It was a pleasure to participate on the examining committee, and congratulations on your Ph. D. and post doctoral position.”

So we now have someone who can wave an important-looking piece of paper at people and tell them that the future lies in the development of perpetual-motion machines. It is no wonder that the public understanding of science is in such a parlous state. But, in this case, what can one expect? An entire state, which owes its existence largely to the lies of a crooked/insane evangelist (is there any other sort), can hardly be expected to exercise any sort of rational quality-control over its academic output. 

PS Ron. You did not ‘participate on the examining committee’; you were merely ‘standing at the back of the room’, albeit in electronic form. 

Testing UFT88 and UFT175 to Destruction

April 21, 2015

Testing Google with UFT88 and UFT175

April 21, 2015

These are two of the most heavily studied papers of the UFT series, refuting Einsteinian general relativity and the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle respectively. By typing the titles into Google without ” ” the following results are obtained:”

Inserting those search terms into Google Scholar yields 4 hits (zero citations) and 8 hits (zero citations), respectively. And your point is …?