Analysis of UFT25 on Google Scholar

Analysis of UFT25 on

March 13, 2016

In the eleven months from April 2015 to February 2016, 398,712 printed pages of the paper were downloaded The paper is fifteen pages long, A4 single spaced, so a conversion of one printed page = 3.646 kilobytes was used. So the paper was read 26,581 times in eleven months. For combined sites it was read 42,530 times in eleven months, which is 46,396 times a year. It was written in 2004, so from 2004 to 2016 it has been read 510,350 times, about half a MILLION times.”

It has been cited only twice … by Ron. When Ron cited it in the crackpot Journal of New Energy, it was in turn cited 35 times: mainly by Ron and gang-member Amador, plus one extraneous loony (whose paper of course remains uncited). The proof of the pudding is in the eating, Ron. Making daily listings of ‘internet noise’ is no proof of anything. Why would your followers remain so quiet? You claim that they are scared but, at the same time, you claim that your crackpot theory is now the accepted one. Your story just does not hold water, does it?    


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: