Archive for October, 2016

Desperate Back-Peddling

October 28, 2016

Caution about Site

October 28, 2016

No I have adopted the rule that if people send me off topic articles out of the blue I send them out to the group, especially when they make no attempt to apply ECE theory or even to refer to it, when essentially every one else in the scientific world knows about the new avant garde physics. The group is not obliged to read this stuff because by now it is made up of world leading scientists and engineers of integrity. Posting of this type of article on the blog does not mean I approve of it. The blog is a diary, or record of daily events. I am not a creationist but know Genesis 1.1 “Yn y dechreuad y creodd Duw y nefoedd a’r ddaear”. This is the first book of Moses known as Genesis. It is obviously prose poetry, not literal. I have every respect for genuine piety but that should not be based on a literal interpretation. There is also Ioan 1: “Yn y dechreaud yr oedd y Gair, a’r Gair oedd Duw, a Duw oedd y Gair.” Hawking is a creationist, which is why big bang was devised. It is scientific nonsense. Yn y dechreuad yr oedd Hawking, a’r Gair oedd Hawking, a Hawking oedd y Gair.” why should the universe have a beginning?”

Haha. As if that were the only loony website that Ron has brought to the attention of the ECE ‘scholars’. It is so rarely that anyone outside of the ‘Acquired Idiocy Asinine Society’ contacts him, that he is pathetically grateful for any crumb of comfort from the outside world. And now he thinks that Hawking is a creationist? Where exactly does Hawking date the Big Bang (a term coined by a rabid pseudoscientist by the way – what irony) to 4004BCE? On a related note, Ron, how does one render in Welsh that passage where Moses demands the ‘first go’, ahead of his generals, on any underage girls captured after a battle and after the slaughter of all of the male losers. And this is the book that is taught in Sunday school and the book that some people swear on in court? No wonder that ‘the church’ attracts so many perverts.

A Pinch of Salt Lake City

October 27, 2016

Suggested Monograph by Steve Bannister: “The Second Industrial Revolution”

October 26, 2016

AIAS Fellow Dr. Stephen Bannister is a development economist in the University of Utah and wrote his Ph. D. Thesis on the second industrial revolution expected to take place with the implementation of ES (Energy from Spacetime) and LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Rections).”

No, he did not! If he had mentioned any of those concepts he would never have got the doctorate, even in Utah: we may think of it as being the ‘[bats in] belfry’ state … but others still call it the ‘beehive’ state. Were you not some sort of external examiner for that thesis? Did you even read it?

 

Lap-Dog-Days

October 27, 2016

EDCL Days

October 26, 2016

Yes we would have easily have carried out this experiment there. I think that your experimentation with Trevor is excellent, and just take it easy and pull out the biro when you feel like it. We are a bunch of friends here and all my suggestions are just that, suggestions.”

Evans-the-Sewage mentioned that ‘retirement looms’. We thought that he had already retired. So we wonder again: just how many of those frequent lap-dog e-mails to Ron were sent during work-time while Sewage was being paid out of the public purse? 

Goebbels Would Be Proud

October 27, 2016

High Resolution Version of Cover

October 27, 2016

Many thanks! I am forwarding to Sam at New Generation.”

But it is still not good enough for a cover; how can you all miss that error … again and again? And Dr G. would have admired the way in which you again state all of those lies as if they were the truth. When did Siemens Stain become a chemist, by the way?  Still, we delight in the way in which you insist on commemorating your delusions in concrete form. When all electronic traces of your drivel have vanished, there will still be perhaps a printed version rotting in the open-air honesty bookshops of Hay-on-Wye. That will not mean a lot to most readers, but Ron will feel the slight and he can explain it to his Commonwealth collaborators.

 

Electrifying … Not!

October 27, 2016

Plasma and modern cosmology

October 27, 2016

Agreed in a sense because of triple unification of electrodynamics, gravitation and fluid dynamics with ECE2. There is no longer any philosophical difference between electrodynamics, gravitation and fluid dynamics. The moving frame of paper UFT360 just posted is spacetime itself, (aether or vacuum). The plasma universe goes back many years but now we are seeing how it is structured through a unified field theory.”

So Ron has finally bought-in to the major branch of pseudoscience known as the ‘Electric Universe’.

https://crackpotwatch.wordpress.com/2016/04/12/shermer-on-crothers/

This nonsense was thought up by people who simply cannot comprehend that the universe is structured by gravity, even though the latter is some

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

times weaker than the other fundamental forces. This will make Ron a junior partner however because former AIAS loony, Dunging-Davies, is one of the ringleaders.  Perhaps that is why Ron agrees only ‘in a sense’.

A Bit of a Devil

October 25, 2016

One enthusiastically negative reviewer (nothing to do with us) has been taking an interest in the oeuvre of Ron:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/pdp/profile/A1P6IIFLIQ5M7H/ref=cm_cr_dp_pdp

 

Asking the Right Questions

October 24, 2016

FOR POSTING Perfect Health

October 22, 2016

It is well known that a lot of mindless libel has been disseminated on the net about my health. Apparently this is part of troll activity directed against me personally because of my views on physics. These are radically new and making a tremendous impact worldwide. Apparently a few people, some of them local and wholly unscientific, don’t like ideas or impact, or achievement of any kind. So I went through a voluntary government assessment about a month ago and was found to be in perfect health. I am giving a few details which is normally confidential to me, in order to shut up the gossip once and forever. There were no impairments noted at the Government assessment, no functional restrictions displayed. My mood was stable throughout and there is no medical evidence to suggest any illness, physical or psychological. I handled papers without difficulty, displayed good eye contact and had adequate interaction with the assessor. There was no evidence of cognitive, intellect or memory impairment and I can plan and follow the route of a journey unaided. This is consistent with my medical history files and how I was able to engage with the assessor. My mental state examination results show no illness of any kind, and my visual results with new glasses about three weeks old show essentially perfect vision.”

This is very important in both science and medicine (although one always has to bear in mind that medical ‘doctors’ rarely hold a higher academic degree than a bachelors). Are the bog-standard questions which are aimed mainly at spotting work-dodgers and fake benefit claimants really adequate to detect a Napoleon Complex or other profound malady? Our questions would have been:

Do you believe yourself to be one of the world’s greatest scientists, even though nobody cites your work in the scientific literature or shows any other sign of using it?

Do you believe your medals and scientific papers to be very valuable, even though you have twice tried to sell them with zero success? (If you know a professional economist, ask him to explain the ‘theory of value’ to you; assuming that he is not himself a crackpot).

Do you claim to have theoretical proof that various confidence tricksters really do possess viable perpetual-motion machines?

Have you recommended that HM Government should invest in the development of one of those machines; specifically a never-seen cancer-curing levitating perpetual-motion machine supposedly constructed by a forger, deserter, petty thief and criminal vandal when he was a teenager some 70 years ago?

Have you used HM’s treasury, certainly without permission, as your affiliation for your supposedly ‘scientific’ papers? 

Do you have an accomplice who has proclaimed, on internet radio, that Einstein was an anti-Tesla tool of the Rockefellers and that Einstein and Cartan helped the Nazis to build anti-gravity flying saucers AND, when you had the opportunity to deny these ludicrous claims on the same radio show, did you fail to do so?

Have you suggested that the Bessler Wheel, a fraudulent energy-producing device which was exposed centuries ago, was actually a viable device?

Have you illegally backed supposed (i.e. quack) cancer-cures, quite contrary to UK law?

Do you believe yourself to be a member of the British aristocracy, even though the College-of-Arms will happily tell any inquirer that you are certainly not?

Do you take on feudal titles simply because you feel like it?

Do you try to impede lawful building-work in your environs, while making dubious property claims of your own?

Do you consider yourself to be an uncrowned king, and decoration, of your community, even though the evidence is that the community is more inclined to think you a pariah?

Have you committed acts of sedition by proposing the secession of Wales from the UK and its nuclear protection by a foreign power?

Do you routinely exhibit ‘transference’; that is, do you routinely accuse others (‘trolls’) of lying (your own defect) when they merely ‘speak as they find’ and have overwhelming proof to back up such free speech?

We could go on, and on, and on, but you get the idea. Perhaps our readers could suggest some supplementary questions. 

 

 

 

Set in Stone

October 21, 2016

FOR POSTING: Hardback Version of “The Principles of ECE”

October 21, 2016

I am most grateful to my friend and colleague Dr Horst Eckardt for sending me a copy. It is excellently produced in hardback in good quality paper, 288 pages with illustrations. www.epubli.de 2 000034 590421 0001.”

Are we to take it that the sloppy item which you posted for free on your blog has now been turned – uncorrected  – into just so much waste paper? Perhaps anyone who comes upon the printed version could check for us. For example, look for the misspellings of electro which occur in the table-of-contents, in a chapter-heading, in the text, in page headings and in the index. A quality piece-of-work, or at least one which reflects the ‘quality’ of everyone involved!

Still Fitting Only Where It Touches

October 21, 2016

The Major Advance in Understanding

October 21, 2016

The Hooke Newton inverse square law can describe ANY orbit in the relevant moving coordinate system. The acceleration is the convective or Lagrange derivative of the orbital velocity. The Lagrangian dervivative is, self consistently, the derivative taken with respect to a moving coordinate system.”

For those who have not  realized it yet: Ron has never done any real science. He has never explained a puzzling phenomenon, he has never carefully sifted evidence in order to clarify cause and effect. All that he did, even in his pre-breakdown days, was ‘glorified curve-fitting’; at best, the mathematical modelling of the results of others. He has carried that habit over into his crackpot life. He finds an analogy which works  … up to a point and hides the failure of the analogy in other areas. He ‘double-counts’: he uses data to concoct a theory, and then uses the same data to confirm it! That is the biggest no-no in experimental science – quite contrary to the ethos of Bacon, which he claims to worship. As we have pointed out again and again in the past, it is all very well to find a model which simulates orbital motion (Hooke did it with a gutta-percha cone), but that alone  is a sterile model. It leads nowhere. So we ask yet again, Ron, how does your ‘theory’ explain tides? How does it explain the Roche limit (the radius at which a large gravitating body will tear apart a smaller body which approaches it)? A real scientific theory, like general relativity, leads on to more and more unexpected phenomena which can be tested experimentally. Your ‘great work’ is just a joke which is laughed at by all but you and other crackpots.

Geographical Note

October 20, 2016

Idaho Hydroelectric and Geothermal Power

October 20, 2016

This is a very sensible solution to power, the wind turbines are minor contributions. The State must be bigger than all of Europe.”

It is smaller than the UK, you twerp. You trump Trump in the lying stakes!