Archive for December, 2016

Tough as a Coal-Miner’s Daughter

December 31, 2016

Ethnic Bias

December 30, 2016

This is an offence in common law, which is why one such incident was recently investigated by the Neath Hate Crime Unit, which expressed deep concern, and rightly so. In my opinion, a remark about being the son of a coal miner is ethnic bias. It is an offence in common law, a violation of human rights. Much of my poetry is about coal mining, they were highly intelligent people in this village. Their level of culture was much higher than that in a university department for example. My Bro Iaith policy is designed to revive the language and culture. refusal to recognize a coat of arms is an offence under the law of arms, and could be construed as ethnic bias. In fact, being raised to the Gentry is minor compared with being descended from the Princes. In the law of Hywel Dda that means that one is a nobleman or Uchelwr. This was the rank held by Owain Glyndw^r. Aneurin Bevan was also the son of a coal miner, and a coal miner himself. So were tens of thousands of distinguished people. People who make such remarks should try a shift underground one day.”

Your rant is as clear as coal-slurry Ron. Are you upset at being called the son of a coal-miner, or at not being granted your true ethnic status?  If the coal-miners were more intelligent than university staff, why did you aspire to become one of the latter rather than enjoying the poetry-readings and mathematical theorizing at the coal-face? Some minimal experimentation on the angle-of-repose of wet coal-slurry might have avoided a later disaster.  Could you not pass the coal-mine entry examinations?  We certainly think that the world of science would have benefited greatly from your being a coal-miner rather than a wannabe physicist. Did you ever try a shift underground? Is it too late”

Advertisements

The Relativity of Loonies

December 31, 2016

Paper from Michael Jackson

December 31, 2016

We love to see missives from No-Bubbles Jackson, because he is so clearly insane and Ron’s acceptance of his ideas makes Ron look very very bad. It was No-Bubbles who wrote a ‘paper’ claiming that ECE explains the human soul. It was also he who was interviewed by the revolting shock-jock Rancid Rense and who told that sicko that Einstein was planted (by the Rockefellers) at the Bern  Patent Office in order to undermine Tesla. He further told Rancid that Cartan and Einstein had supplied the Nazis with the information which allowed the latter to build anti-gravity aircraft (LOL). When Ron was interviewed by Rancid shortly afterwards, he did not deny any of No-Bubble’s claims. Now No-Bubbles has sent Ron a well-known ‘paper’ from the lunatic fringe. It claims that ‘gyroscopes’ (they are in fact only mono-gimballed spinning-tops)  do not obey Newton’s Third Law and therefore promise reaction-less  propulsion and UFO-style levitation. This is where a sort of ‘relativity of scientific authority’ comes in. That is, No-Bubbles and Ron and the remainder of the lunatic fringe think that such mad gyroscopic ideas are validated by being endorsed by a ‘famous engineer’ such as Laithwaite or by a ‘Boeing engineer’  like Mike Gamble. They also think that a granted patent on an invention is scientific proof. The truth is that the accepted scientific evidence instead reveals Laithwaite, Gamble and patent office examiners to be incompetent clowns. Relatively speaking, physics advances and the loonies go backwards. Of course, Laithwaite and Gamble were/are electrical engineers; a breed which is always disproportionately represented in the lunatic fringe. To be fair, one should also mention Dunging-Davies, former AIAS member and head of the rival crackpot  organization, TGA. Dunging-Davies has co-authored a book which bases a whole ‘new science of mechanics’ upon Laithwaite’s deceptive Royal Institution Christmas Lectures (the first never to be transcribed for posterity). When Dunging-Davies was awarded a worthless gong by a crackpot group, that fact was mentioned as being a good thing in the yearbook of Dunging’s university! It is rather worrying that a British university can no longer spot pseudoscientific cant.

 

Keep Up, Ron!

December 28, 2016

Joint Venture between ET3M and NanoLabs Corporation

December 28, 2016

This is a joint venture betweem ET3M, led by AIAS / UPITEC team member Alex Hill, and NanoLabs Corporation of Michigan. The energy from spacetime devices of Alex Hill have been extensively tested and have received industrial certification. As in UFT311 the AIAS theory can explain them precisely, but the standard model of physics cannot. As in UFT364 the circuit of UFT311 has been replicated precisely. I have nominated the team for five gold and silver medals of the Institute of Physics, partly for major discoveries such as these and their industrial implementation. I expect that such devices will rapidly proliferate at the start of the second industrial revolution, and will eventuially make fossil burning power stations and wind turbines obsolete.”

 

We covered this ‘joint venture’ when it was first announced.

crackpotwatch.wordpress.com/2015/06/14/boiler-room-news/

At that time, it involved two dodgy companies. And now, it involves  … two dodgy companies.

ScamAlert

Rogue Member

December 27, 2016

What is this?!!!

709-2119-1-pb

It is a paper by an AIAS member, but there are two serious problems with it. Firstly, it discusses the details of black holes but, according to the precepts of AIAS (and of associated loony, Public-Dick Crothers), black  holes do not exist. The second problem is that the author gives his affiliation as being AIAS, Budapest, Hungary. This raises an interesting question: which is the genuine operation? Is it the Hungarian group, which accepts the standard model, or the loony Craigcefnparc group which believes in perpetual-motion and anti-gravity? Does Ron have any right to use the AIAS name at all? Is he a bigger fraud than even we had imagined? We demand that Ron explain himself immediately, and provide some evidence that he is really the head of AIAS.

FFS, Give it Up!

December 27, 2016

Auctioning the Medals

December 27, 2016

I will make a steady and continuous effort to sell my medals, the next in line is Stacks Bowers which recently sold a Nobel Prize medal for $1.1 million.”

You are a nonentity: one of us was willing to pay a few thousand for them at the last auction, on the basis that they would increase in (novelty) value when you are later outed as a national disgrace. Hybristophilia is a great selling-point.

“If I do manage to sell them I can support science and Welsh language culture in Wales, and help AIAS / UPITEC in various ways. ”

You can help science for nothing … by leaving it. Stop lying about your ‘success’, stop confusing students with your crackpot theories … and stop playing the ‘Lord of the Manor’.

“My Newlands Family Trust and Bro Iaith policy are set up with this purpose in mind, to try to stop the catastrophic decline of the Welsh language in Mawrt. ”

The locals tell us that you do absolutely nothing to help that process, and even deny the existence of effective Welsh-medium education in the area.

“The asking price for the $1.1 million medal was about $100,000. For an agreed upon commission, Mullock’s might like to work to auction the medals to a knowledgeable clientele with Stacks Bowers or Christie’s which recently sold the Watson Nobel Medal for $4.76 million.”

What you really need is an ignorant clientele, which might be fooled by your lies.

“Watson has been ostracized for many years by his colleagues because of his views. Sadly this happens all too often in science. This is why he had to sell his Medal. The buyer, a billionaire, gave the medal back to Watson. He was awarded the Nobel Prize with Crick for the discovery of DNA (Watson and Crick). So I think that the valuation of my medals at about a million pounds is fair, in fact on the low side. many thanks to Mullock’s for storing them safely in their strong room. ”

Ostracized or not, he is way ahead of you. You have no value … and neither do your medals (apart from the scrap-metal value).

“The Crick Estate sold Crick’s medal for $ 2.0 million (attached). The AIAS / UPITEC team and myself have been kindly nominated for a total of ten gold and silver medals of the Institute of Physics, and for the Newton Medal, its highest award.”

Yes, ‘kindly nominated’ by one another! Why don’t you try to win one of those Telesio-Galilei gold medals that you used to praise so highly? Just imagine how proud you would feel, accepting such a wonderful gong, perhaps on the stage of the Patti theatre … ooooops!

Cheap Option

December 27, 2016

Nomination for Honorary Fellowship of the Institute of Physics

December 27, 2016

This will go in tomorrow. Then I will look at the American Institute of Physics awards, to see if other team nominations can be made.”

Oh come on, Ron, everybody knows that anyone who ‘looks good on paper’ can get a Fellowship from the IOP (or the American equivalent  … which often accepts crackpot presentations for its conferences) just by asking. The snag is that one has to pay annual fees … which is kind of the point.

Random Notes

December 26, 2016

Sharp Increase in Interest in my Essay and Poetry Readings of 2015

December 25, 2016

This is probably due to Michael Jackson’s great work in posting them on youtube. There is great interest in the poetry readings in both languages and in the poetry books.”

But the YouTube vids are little visited … just like last time.

“My work is safely archived on the wayback machine in San Francisco (www.archive.org) and that locality is no longer ruled by London.”

San Francisco never was ‘ruled by London’ you ignorant ‘dual citizen’ clown.

 

 

Another Year of Abject Failure

December 25, 2016

Outstanding Year for AIAS / UPITEC

December 25, 2016

The last year and a half have seen the publication of fifty papers on ECE2, and 2016 has seen the publication in hardback and softback of “Principles of ECE”, currently being read 6,426 times a year off combined sites, an outstandingly successful monograph by any standards. ”

‘Read’ is a rather elevated term for this process and, whatever else the ‘readers’ do with it, they certainly do not cite this worthless ‘book’.

“The radically new and powerful theories of fluid electrodynamics and fluid gravitation were published. ”

Ron has re-introduced the aether, quite forgetting that experiment has always failed to detect any such ‘fluid’ medium.

“The fifty ECE2 papers are being read about 33,000 times a year. Early in 2016 www.aias.us was made visible on the Wayback Machine, (www.archive.org), by Dave Burleigh, so a great amount of work is safely archived there, and also visible along with http://www.upitec.org and http://www.et3m.net. ”

The papers are all rubbish and, again, are never cited by anybody but the AIAS gang. The Wayback Machine archives everything, regardless of value, and the records are far from complete.

“The well known circuit of AIAS Fellow Osamu Ide (explained exactly by ECE theory in UFT311) has been replicated exactly in UFT364, causing immediate international interest. I can see this as usual from the scientometrics. The Co President Gareth Evans has received many invitations to attend high level strategic meetings and conferences as a result of this major breakthrough in new energy technology by AIAS / UPITEC. ”

And Sewage will be thrown out if he dares to mention perpetual-motion machines at any non-crank assembly.

“Douglas Lindstrom has published a review of low energy nuclear reactors. ”

… and sent it to a bunch of loonies in Florida.

“Horst Eckardt, UPITEC President, and Bernhard Foltz, flew to Tokyo and replicated the Osamu Ide device exactly with completely independent apparatus. This means that such circuits can be mass produced in future after patenting. ”

So the Eckardt-Foltz machine could power the Ideotic machine, and the Ideotic machine could power the Eckardt-Foltz machine and they all lived happy ever after. Except that they didn’t because the concept is nonsense.

“Osamu Ide has sent written testimony to a House of Lords Committee on this development, and I hope that the London, Cardiff and Edinburgh Governments will fund and rapidly develop the breakthrough, otherwise they will lose out again as so often happens. ”

A lot of other cranks also sent testimony.

“The AIAS / UPITEC team has been nominated for six gold medals and six silver medals of the Institute of Physics, and from now on will be regularly nominated for relevant medals and awards. All my indicators show that ECE has arrived centre stage.”

Yes, you nominated yourselves. Big deal!

Already One Honour Too Many

December 25, 2016

Nomination for a National Honour

December 25, 2016

In response to a question from one of the AIAS Fellows it is possible to apply to become a Member of the House of Lords, the process is similar to the Civil List Pension, very rigorous we are told”

It cannot  be that rigorous in the case of the Civil List pension or you would never have got it.

“In my case it is the wrong type of appointment because I am a U. S. dual citizen”

Only in the UK; the US does not recognize dual citizenship.

“and already a Civil List Pensioner, equivalent to a Life Peer or Baron”

Lie; it is just a pension.

“and I don’t much believe in the House of Lords. However I will support the team to the utmost of my ability in written testimony and in person. ”

Good. That will sink ’em.

“The last time I was in London, my wife and I were at Buckingham Palace. If there were an Upper, Welsh speaking, House in the Welsh Assembly that could be different, but for me it would drag me away from my work. The only relevant State honour commensurate with Civil List Pensioner is C. H. or O. M. I already have the equivalent of knighthood, being a Civil List Pensioner recognized by a coat of arms. ”

Utter rubbish.

“Lloyd George, when he was a radical pushing for reform, described the House of Lords as a collection of the unemployed chosen at random, but when he became a grand old man, he became the hereditary Earl Lloyd George of Dwyfor, despite being a Welsh speaking Baptist like myself. A Baptist is supposed to be a Republican and Leveller, a four hundred year old tradition.”

Lloyd George was a crook from whom knighthoods and lordships could be bought.

“There are forty eight Companions of Honour at present, the two physicists who are C. H are Hawking and Higgs, two standard modellers again. The radical new science is represented by myself as Civil List Pensioner. I got it by three side steps and a swerve. ”

No, by lies told by other plausible cranks, by an immoral ‘Royal Society’ that does  as it is told, and by the endemic pig-ignorance of science among the general public.

“There are two athletes I recognize on the C. H. list: Sebastian Coe (800, 1,500 metres) and Mary Peters (pentathlon and shot put). However George Osborne is also a C. H., so that lowers standards dramatically. I would say that if Higgs can get a C. H. with a very low h index and very few publications, anyone could get a C. H. ”

Oh Ron, it is not about quantity … it is about quality.

“The Order of Merit is chosen by Queen Elizabeth herself and there are only 25 members of the Order. The Civil List Pensioners are also chosen by Queen Elizabeth herself, but on ministerial advice. Penrose is an O. M., he is not as aimlessly dogmatic as Hawking.”

Penrose in fact  has one foot in the lunatic fringe due to his strange beliefs concerning the relationship between quantum mechanics and human consciousness.

“I have produced eight five times more publications than Higgs (attached), who was a figurehead or god father figure. I would think that the C. H. is controlled by standard modellers, but if Gareth would like to have a go at nominating for C. H., the form is attached. ”

Again Ron, it is all about quality; not quantity. One theoretical paper with experimental support is worth a thousand theoretical (and mathematically defective) papers with no subsequent experimental support.

“The Queen is ill a lot of the time, and has been on the throne since 1952. ”

And even at her best she is no physicist. It is well known that the interests of the British royal family are closer to those of the unskilled British working-class than to those of its  aspirational  middle class.

“Although I am a staunch republican and republican nationalist, it will be a shock to find one day that the old Queen is gone. I wonder whether the monarchy will survive. I hope that the 1649 Republic will be reinstated. This is also the view of the present Leader of the Opposition, a true or Bevanite socialist.”

He will be gone before the Queen is.

Rank Delusion

December 25, 2016

Prisoners kept Illegally inIndia

December 25, 2016

As the leading British Civil List scientist, and a sometime member of the Nobel Prize winning Amnesty International, I demand that these prisoners be released or tried. If not I demand that the U. N. impose sanctions on India.”

Those mercenaries are very lucky that Ron has no real influence; having a friend of pseudoscientific fraudsters involved would hardly help their case.

 

Hilarity Reigns

December 23, 2016

Parliamentary Committee

December 23, 2016

If they invite me to give evidence I will certainly give written evidence on your behalf, and if asked, evidence in person. Although I am a member of the Gentry I am not a Life Peer, but if invited to be a Life Peer I can think about taking up a seat in Westminster. These days however, the Assembly may develop an upper house. I would be more interested in that, becoming a Senator like Yeats. Usually a Peerage is given to people on the political side of things, but sometimes it is given to intellectuals. There is a precedent in a U. S. citizen taking up a Peerage, that was Lady Astor, who as an American born English socialite whose second marriage was to Waldorf Astor. I am British born, naturalized a U. S. citizen at Cornell in 2000. AI am the first U. S. dual citizen in history to be appointed to the Civil List, directly by my distant cousin the Queen.”

You do realize, don’t you Ron, that ludicrous statements such as these will eventually end up in a real book/expose and will be laughed at by physicists all over the world: fame at last! Of course, some strange people do get elevated to the Lords: you may have heard of a Professor Atkins, an ultra-successful chemist and textbook writer. Well, his ex-wife was fast-tracked after your Mr Blair made peerages more democratic (and Civil List Pension recommendations totally demented). She was given Faraday’s old post of Director of the Royal Institution before being elevated. While Director of the RI, some cruel observers suggested (due to her habit of offering photo-opportunities while wearing a leather skirt and leaning against a tree) that she conjured up thoughts of a rather older profession. So a crackpot peer (Lord Evans of Cloudcuckooland) would not necessarily lower standards. No doubt the thought of receiving hundreds of pounds per day, simply for turning up, would overcome your agoraphobia: we all know that money-grubbing is your main ‘scientific’ aim. We understand that the US theoretically requires candidates for naturalization to renounce their original nationality, so your sole remaining claim-to-fame is to be the only anti-scientific crackpot to be appointed to the Civil List.

Blatant

December 22, 2016

Marquis Entries

December 22, 2016

The team can enter all twelve medal nominations into their entries for “Marquis Who’s Who” if relevant. If anyone wishes me to nominate him or her for Marquis just let me know. I was nominated by Bo Lehnert in 1998. This includes scientists, artists, poets novelists, historians and genealogists on this listing. Marquis does not charge any fee, and entry is purely on merit. Multi millionaires cannot buy an entry.”

And that is how things are done in the lunatic fringe: they nominate themselves, and then add the ‘accolades’ to their own vanity-publication entries. In the case of those who have real jobs, the worthless Marquis data may well be added to a CV and fool gullible employers  … such as Ceredigion County Council? Any idiot can get into Marquis … Searl, for example.

 

Comedy Turns

December 22, 2016

Invitations for the Co President of AIAS, Dr Gareth John Evans.

December 22, 2016

This is an excellent development, Ceredigion County Council should pay all expenses if the invitations do not. These are all committees at an international level, and should be told all about AIAS / UPITEC, UFT311, UFT321 and UFT364 if they do not already know the work. UFT364 already looks like a classic, similar to UFT88.”

What are the odds that the invitations will be withdrawn if the organizers are made aware of Sewage’s enthusiasm for promoting perpetual-motion schemes and the crackpot theory of his master? Chances are that he will pull the Ideotic-type trick of making an anodyne (nut-free) presentation at the conference … and then tell everybody else that he ‘lectured on energy-from-nowhere’. If we really thought that he would mention perpetual-motion in his presentation, we would send a representative along to heckle.

 

Sewage Santa!

December 21, 2016

FOR POSTING: Nomination by the Co President of AIAS

December 21, 2016

I would be most grateful if this could be posted alongside the individual nomination on my page, “about m” section, of www.aias.us . It can then be referred to in the nominations. I am most grateful for this detailed and eloquent nomination.”

Yes, the secret Santa was Sewage all along; that sort of thing is what makes Team Incest … Team Incest. His nomination-form starts off well with the sort of boiler-plate ‘Big Book of Science’ text that passes for  scientific history among non-physicists. But then he shoots everybody concerned in the foot by mentioning the pseudoscientific fraudster Tesla (Telsa to the stupid, and Tessler to the very stupid, Googlers of the lunatic fringe). And if that were not enough, he throws in the perpetual-motion conmen, Hill-of-Beans and Ideotic. One notes that Sewage has promoted both Ron and Ideotic to ‘professor’.  Such ‘academic inflation’ is routine in the lunatic fringe.

Secret Santa

December 21, 2016

FOR POSTING: Nominations to date

December 21, 2016

To Co President Gareth Evans:

Good to hear from you, The AIAS / UPITEC team has been nominated by myself as team leader for twelve medals of the Institute of Physics: Newton, Dirac, Faraday, Glazebrook, Bragg and Blodgett Gold Medals, and six silver medals. My individual nominations to date are: Nobel Prize, Wolf Prize, Milner Prize, Civil List Pension, the Copley, Royal and Davy Medals of the Royal Society, Dirac Medal, and the Priestley, Langmuir and Hildebrand awards of the American Chemical Society. Nominations cover all aspects of the team’s work from 1974 to present: theoretical, experimental, new distance teaching methods, new methods of research impact measurement, applied physics, industrial application.”

Hmm, all of those nominations but who exactly is doing the nominating? Is Team Incest living up to its name and nominating itself? Or is one of the more distant halo of incompetents, such as the idiots who recommended Ron for a Civil List Pension or who  called his nonsense-physics a ‘paradigm shift’ doing it? That grandiose term was, by the way, coined by another crackpot who founded a whole new field called ‘sociology of science’ and made it fashionable for physics-challenged busybodies to stick their oars in. Kuhn had cherry-picked ‘evidence’ to ‘prove’ that sciences advanced by revolution rather than evolution. His view is therefore very popular in the lunatic fringe. But not only is his ‘revolution’ concept contrived, his own work was marred by glaring errors in elementary physics.

Go Team Incest!

December 20, 2016

AIAS / UPITEC Team Nominated for the Newton Medal

December 20, 2016

This is the highest award of the Institute of Physics. Nomination will follow for the Dirac, Faraday and Kelvin gold medals. Judging on the phenomenal impact of the team’s work, it deserves one of these awards.”

There is of course no real ‘team’. There is a loudmouthed loony who is scared to submit his worthless calculations to a reputable scientific journal. He claims simultaneously that all such journals are biased against him and that every scientist already agrees with him. Apart from the central loony, there is a ‘krautpot’ who plots with dog-like devotion the meaningless results of the nonsense equations. The remainder of the team is just a collection of camp-followers who do indeed prostitute any academic qualifications which they possess. Special mention goes to ‘sewage Evans’; ‘science officer’ at a Welsh County Council. The only thing that this team deserves is investigation by various awarding bodies.

Memory Lapse?

December 19, 2016

Value of My Medal Collection

December 19, 2016

The value of the collection has increased to about £1.25 million pounds, and I attach a conservative valuation of them. They are kept in the strong room of Mullock’s.”

But Ron, Mullock has already tried to auction them and one of us was willing to fork-out a thousand or two because of their novelty-value. Have you forgotten that nobody was in the least interested? You already owe Mullock a fee for a failed auction, and you are paying them for storage as well?  That will really eat into the value of your trinkets.

 

Seconded!

December 18, 2016

“One Response to “About Dr. Evans”

  1. Charles Bovey Says:
    Sir;

    Remarkable work!

    Have you examined the work of the Iranian MT Keshe of http://www.keshefoundation.com in Belgium? He claims it is validated by a number of organizations but he is “boxed out” due to the ramifications.

    All the same, he is trying to bring certain devices to market with his own resources.

    Regards,

    Charles Bovey”

    We agree: Ron is, in every way, the equal of the conman, Keshe.  They are both cranks and they both push frauds such as perpetual-motion machines.

Hoax Gone Wrong

December 17, 2016

Discussion of notes 363(4), 363(5)

December 17, 2016

These are very interesting continuative or inductive remarks. I agree that the x theory is a first approximation, mathematically it is quite interesting because it gives the fractal conic sections, but in physics Eq. (22) of Note 363(5) must be integrated to give the orbit in terms of the spin connection and force.”

Perhaps this would be a good time to reveal a hoax which one our followers attempted to perpetrate some years ago. He sent Ron a question concerning the nonsensical results obtained by making the step-size too big in a computer-simulation of orbits. It was sent in the name of a Cardiff schoolboy, and the plan was to reveal details of the letter after Ron (in his desperation for human contact and scientific support) had mentioned it in his blog. Unfortunately, our follower had underestimated said desperation and was wrong-footed when Ron posted the original letter. If only our colleague had marked the reverse side in some distinctive manner. Of course, Ron will now claim that the present note  is just another ploy on our part. Well, all that he has to do is contact the school named in the letter and ask to be put in touch with its author.

Through a Veil of Tears

December 11, 2016

List of prizes, medals and awards – Wikipedia – Physics

December 11, 2016

Many thanks indeed to Mr Rajpal in New Delhi. I will go through these prizes and awards to see which ones are most suitable, and will update my list of achievements (attached). In writing my part of “ECE2: The Second Paradigm Shift” I can see that we have made far more fundamental and applied discoveries than any comparable small research group in the world. I am the individual world record holder for publications (attached list of prolific authors) ”

We literally do not know whether to laugh or cry. The very idea that Ron could win any sort of prize is either risible (if one is a cynic) or tragic (if one is a kindly soul). What has he done in the past? Got that youngest-ever DSc? We think that  that was a desperate ploy by Aberystwyth to get rid of him. All of those fellowships ‘won in open competition’? Just one fellowship usually leads onto a lectureship and perhaps a professorial chair. But nobody seemed to want Ron on a permanent basis. And when he finally got a proper job, he screwed that up royally. Whereas quantity of publications may be useful in the competition for promotion, it is quality that brings the glittering prizes. Theories to which nobody else subscribes do not count.  

“We have also forged a new method of distance teaching at essentially all the best universities, institutes and similar.”

At best you may confuse students. It is clear that nobody uses your so-called results.

“The well known scientometrics show this conclusively and of course, objectively. ”

They are not even sufficiently well known to be notorious. The hits from academic visitors are as meaningless as the other 98% coming from porn websites etc.

“Several AIAS / UPITEC staff could be nominated, not only myself. ”

But which are the halt and which are the lame?

“The task of nominating and supporting can be made easy with the attached list of achievements. If I can apply directly for any of these awards I will. To date I have been nominated for the Nobel Prize (I accept what I have been told by responsible people), and certainly for the Wolf Prize, Milner Prize, various medals of the ACS, various medals of the RS and Dirac Medal. ”

Can the ’empty set’ be a ‘list of achievements’?

“The RSC / RS nomination for a Civil List Pension succeeded in 2005 as is well known, and I was awarded arms on merit in 2008. ”

The RSC must have had an off-day, and the RS deny having had anything to do with it. Anybody with reasonable credentials and a few thousand pounds can get a coat-of-arms.

“The attached Marquis entry for 2017 records all of these awards and nominations, made on behalf of new science as well as myself. Many thanks again to nominators and all supporters!”

Marquis is a vanity publication, and does not check facts. Tell them anything, and they will parrot it back.

“Our work in education is as important as in research. I have survived the grave miscarriages of justice with key international help.”

The first  part is probably true: neither are of any importance. The second part cries out for the addendum: … so far.

 

Top Nut Out of Control?

December 8, 2016

Oops, sorry, that was a misprint: it should have been, “Topknot Out of Control?”

drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/bernhard/

But we are puzzled Ron, why is he playing with a Bedini perpetual-motion machine? If that worked, why is he now playing with the Ideotic device? How many  different perpetual-motion machines does the world need? On the bright side, at least he is not the Bernhard Foltz who is obsessed with stomach-compression.

Delayed Satisfaction

December 8, 2016

Miscarriage of Justice at UCW Aberystwyth

December 8, 2016

It was and is internationally recognized that the events at Aberystwyth recorded in autobiography volume two amount to a grave miscarriage of justice. This should be righted in some way, for example an honorary D. Sc. to Dr Gareth Evans and an honoray fellowship for myself. That would cost nothing in monetary terms but would satisfy the international community of scientists. Honour would be satisfied. I have offered to donate my papers to the Library of UCW Aberystwyth. They are very valuable, because I am a Civil List Pensioner, one of only five to ten scientific CPL’s in all Britain, and could be kept on permanent loan there. They should remain in Wales in one of its institutions.”

The ‘international community of scientists’ will be satisfied only by your giving up the Civil List pension; an accolade to which you have brought only shame.  Your papers are worthless, as two abortive auctions have proved. As to a suitable institution for their storage, may we recommend Cefn Coed Hospital, Swansea. 

The Tragedy of the Perpetual-Motion Inventor

December 8, 2016

Spanish version of UFT 364

December 8, 2016

Many thanks to both colleagues: Alex Hill and Dave Burleigh. UFT364 is an important and precise replication of the Osamu Ide circuit, which demonstrates that it is possible to take energy from the ubiquitous spacetime in which we all live. The replication is part of Baconian science, which means that experiments must be reproducible in one laboratory and repeatable in another laboratory or laboratories. So what is needed now is patenting and mass production of these circuits, which can be applied in all kinds of ways. That will take a lot of hard work by dedicated people, and it needs support from governments and industry worldwide.”

Let us imagine that a loony inventor, we shall call him Ideotic, has developed a genuine perpetual-motion machine. Let us imagine moreover that it is very simple in design; so simple that German cranks can reproduce it without too much expenditure of time or money. How on Earth does he expect to make any money out of it? After all, he has been circulating the plans for some two decades, so everybody knows how to build one. Of course, the fact that their use is not already universal rather militates against it being a workable invention. But even if it were, Ideotic would be unable to prevent anybody from building their own: the world would be saved and he would not make a penny out of it! Patenting it would offer no protection, since a patent protects only against commercializing a device and not against others building one: every home could have a homemade one! That of course was John Searl’s excuse for his anomalously low electricity bills, and they had nothing at all to do with his interfering with the  domestic meter. This must be why he made his perpetual-motion machine (it also levitates and cures cancer) so complicated: no chance of anyone building their own. By the way, Ron, one of our friends tells us that he has sent a copy of UFT364 to Siemens headquarters in Munich. They may contact you for a comment regarding this breakthrough.

Sleight-of-Mouth

December 7, 2016

Important Things in Science

December 7, 2016

These are the same as in the new theology in the time of my direct ancestor Caradog, King of the Silurians, two thousand years ago, purity of purpose and scholarship, in our case accurate comparison with data, and in our time, archiving and our own methods of distance teaching at the best universities and similar in the world. The result has been the complete rejection of ancient dogma. The naive standard modellers underestimate the intelligence of ordinary people. As we say in middle distance athletics, the opposition to the new science has been burned off, and physics will never be the same again. If things were left to the physics establishment one could win a five thousand metre race by fifty metres, and they would give the gold medal to the runner up, or the first string theorist to finish. We just do not take heed of things like that, and the latest UFT364 on the replication of the Ide circuit is already a great success. So congratulations once more to all staffs.”

Physics is notoriously counter-intuitive and the ‘intelligent man-in-the-street’ cannot ‘get his head around’ even its simplest aspects. Some laymen still insist (as did the crackpot Tesla)  that the Moon does not rotate. Others think that it is bigger when near the horizon. Some cannot understand why the illuminated crescent of a day-time Moon does not ‘point’ towards the Sun. In particular, laymen cannot seize the difference between energy and power. This is often exploited by journalists, who invite the lay reader to marvel at the power of a lightning-bolt and quickly compare it to the power consumed by a small town. The journalist fails to mention (assuming that he knows it at all) that the relatively paltry  energy of a bolt would not power the town for more than a millisecond. The power/energy confusion is enthusiastically  exploited by perpetual-motion conmen. A crook named Garabed Giragossian came very close to getting the US government to buy his gadget, which worked by speeding-up a flywheel over a long period and then expending the energy in a short sharp shock. Gullible senators were suitably impressed, but some spoilsport crackpot-watcher pointed out that the energy had been conserved, or slightly diminished; not increased. Hill-of-Beans pulls the same trick on his et3m website, and talks of ‘power multiplication’. In a 2015 paper which Ideotic presented to the ACS, he writes of ‘power-doubling’.   So, either these conmen cannot seize the difference between power and energy, making them stupid, or they do know the difference, thus making them … mere criminals.

A Problem of Definition

December 7, 2016

List of Prolific Authors

December 7, 2016

This confirms that I have produced approximately ten times more work than Hawking. I have not even heard of the latest Milner Prize winners. The physics system is set up in such a way that high impact work they don’t like is minimized, but in the age of the knowledge revolution this fools no one. The result is a tremendous intellectual rejection of the eighty year old politburo by the younger generations. The scientometrics show this conclusively. Once we drift away from the rigour and hard work of scholarship, we put our feet in the domen dail, or cess pit, of human nature. Nevertheless we must fight for fairness.”

Any sweatshop clothing manufacturer would be able to tell you that it is just not enough to be prolific. The product also has to be wanted by the consumer and, if your papers were T-shirts, they would be misshapen ones which fell apart at a touch. You and Crothers do not know the first thing about modern theoretical physics. You, in particular, are clearly still working out of the course-books of your student days. Your brand of ‘scientometrics’ is clearly worthless and reflects nothing more than ‘random internet noise’. The ‘lack of refutations’ does not imply that your nonsense-physics is accepted or sound. It implies rather that nobody really reads it.  

Still Too Modest

December 6, 2016

Accumulating Nominations

December 6, 2016

I should explain that my aim, oft stated, is to build up nominations on behalf of avant garde science, and not myself, and I am most grateful to all nominators and supporters. There are already many nominations, and these are being recorded by Marquis. I will update the attached list of achievements and a future nominator may use this with minimum effort on his part. Similarly I am always prepared to nominate other Fellows if they wish to be nominated. I am not prepared to recognize the existence of a closed shop, or a club, even though everyone knows that such a club exists. My Ph. D. supervisor, Professor Emeritus Mansel Davies, described the Nobel Prize process as a club like any other, but in fact, I am not sceptical (or cynical) to that extent. I have already been appointed directly by Elizabeth II as a Civil List Pensioner, a high State honour, taking precedence over academic honours. Once again, many thanks to all concerned. I assume that if people point out the existence of prizes to me, as they often do, they wish me to be nominated. If this is not the case, please clarify their intentions. Nominators should stand back from the process, so they do not become angry or disappointed as they are quite justified in feeling. There are many kinds of gross injustice in a decadent contemporay society, but corruption and injustice must never be accepted, otherwise there is only barbarism.”

You have done it again, Ron. You have forgotten to mention a whole slew of honours which was put together by the TGA:

https://crackpotwatch.wordpress.com/2014/08/30/too-modest-2/

Is it because these ‘honours’ are even more dubious than the ones that you have yourself compiled? Why is that, when one speaks of avant garde art, one immediately thinks of that famous urinal? Why is it that, when one thinks of your ‘avant garde science’, one thinks of any urinal?

 

 

Edited Out

December 6, 2016

Milner Prize

December 6, 2016

The nominations are made to test the fairness of the system. I am not allowed to apply, otherwise I would apply myself. If you wish Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe will nominate and you can be a supporter if you wish. I cannot accept the idea of a “closed shop” in any walk of life, because this would be accepting corruption.”

Is it really such a good idea to try to curry a nomination from someone who was removed from his post as a journal editor because his atrociously low academic standards let in too many crackpot papers. Do you not, in turn, feel rather guilty … given that many of those loony papers were yours?  Shops should always be closed to the lunatic fringe.

In Your Dreams, In Our Nightmares

December 6, 2016

$3 million prize in fundamental physics will be split between three physi…

December 6, 2016

As the world record holder in number of publications, and also as a scientist making a phenomenal wolrdwide impact, (scientometrics), I should have a good chance of winning one of these.”

You have zero chance of winning anything and, we hope, a good chance of losing your undeserved Civil-List Pension. Even your apparently bona fide papers are little-cited and unremarkable, and it is difficult to understand why you ever got the pension in the first place. Your post-breakdown papers are largely self-published and self-cited and are therefore scientifically worthless. They have had no ‘impact’ at all, and you have had to invent a bogus form of scientometrics in order to fool the gullible. 

“So should other AIAS Fellows, who are now universally regarded as eminent scientist and engineers in their own right. So I can ask Co President Gareth Evans to look up these prizes and organize nominations and support letters if he wishes. ”

They are universally regarded as crackpots; your camp-followers and lap-dogs. Even if they were employable beforehand, their scientific credibility is now at rock-bottom; due to their association with you.

“With the major breakthrough in papers such as UFT311 and UFT364, there should be a good chance given any degree of fair judgment.”

They have already been fairly judged: nobody quotes them. Oh, they fail to cite them ‘because they are scared to’ do they? Well, that is not going to play well with those who are supposed to hand out prize-money, is it?

“I have been nominated many times for the major prizes as in the attached Marquis entry of 2017. The prize money would be ploughed back into science and culture in Wales and elsewhere in the world.”

Marquis is a notorious vanity-publication for losers, and it makes those statements about ‘nominations’ only because you lied about receiving them in the first place!

Committee …d

December 4, 2016

Co President’s Congratulations

December 4, 2016

Fully agreed with Co President Gartth John Evans, who serves on Welsh environment committees.”

We can find no trace of his involvement in any such committees. What would happen, in any case, if such a committee found out that he was associated with you and – by implication – with perpetual-motion scams? We did find a quote by a ‘Dr Gareth John Evans’, dating from2007, stating that, “there is no question that increases in CO2 raise temperature.”

http://archive.li/HwtOl#selection-3005.40-3005.48

Of course, that cannot be the same person because, if it were, he would have to be removed from AIAS for not toeing that insane asylum’s denialist line.

New Tripefest

December 3, 2016

NEW CROSS LINK AND POSTINGS : Essays on Youtube Channel

December 3, 2016

Many thanks, I have looked at them and they look really excellent. I am very glad that you are feeling better, and you have done a great deal of important work for AIAS. If necessary we can certainly post the videos on www.aias.us.”

So you have posted all of those rotten clips on YouTube again? Did you delete all of the original ones? That would be understandable: it must have been very depressing to see how rarely they were viewed, and how little of each one was listened to. Not to mention the huge preponderance of down-thumbs. What makes you think that that is not going to happen all over again? So where were all of your fans? What of your invisible college?  Do you really think that you are fooling anybody? You are the chief clown in a circus of fools; one which is so short of manpower that it would fit in an ordinary car … let alone a clown-car. PS: No-Bubbles has forgotten to block comments – better fix that fast!

Problems at Work?

December 3, 2016

FOR POSTING: UFT364

December 3, 2016

This is a very important replication and can be posted as UFT364. I hope that circuits like this can be mass produced very soon, they are needed for new forms of power.”

We call Eckardt ‘Siemens Stain’ because that is what he is: a stain on the reputation of a great company. What would that electrical company make of an employee who cannot competently analyze a simple electrical circuit, cannot get to the bottom of a superficially puzzling result, leaps to the conclusion that it is due to ‘energy from nowhere’ and tries to dignify that ridiculous idea by citing the contrived theories of a physics nonentity who commands absolutely no respect in the scientific community?  Does the company know what he is up to? Do these stupid papers ever find their way to his superiors? If they do, does the company ignore them … or agree with them? In either case, it would not reflect well on Siemens.

Modern Science

December 3, 2016

Wind 2.67%, 0 – 12 mph, Wales 3 – 9 mph

December 3, 2016

Temperatures are forecast to drop to – 5 centigrade today, but wind turbines are producing essentially no power. In Wales they are producing nothing as usual. Many people have reverted to coal and wood burners to keep warm. Houses are thrown up by developers and are badly built and badly insulated. What genius thought out this energy policy?”

Scientists now say ‘Celsius’ in place of ‘centigrade’ Ron. This is because it was belatedly thought to be unfair that the outlandish scale of Fahrenheit should have an eponymous unit while the sensible scale of Celsius did not. As for energy policy, what sort of ‘genius’ would talk of basing it on perpetual-motion machines?

Family-Tree Fantasy

December 2, 2016

Greetings to Janis Fry and Allen Meredith

December 2, 2016

It was most pleasant to make your acquaintance, and I will support your excellent work with genealogy. It is all on www.aias.us . Carole Hopkin is my cousin in two ways, on the Morgan side and Hopkin side, and Mary Hopkin and I were in Pontardawe Grammar School for six years (1961 – 1967). Mary is a few days older than me, which means that she is over eighteen. I will read your books with great interest. I think that a yew tree dating at Cor Eurgain might determine its year of planting as mid first century, and I will certainly try to have an excavation started of the mound called Cor Eurgain.”

With all of this talk of trees, DNA and genealogy, can it be long before Ron declares that he is related to Yggdrasil. Or perhaps, sticking to the equally manufactured christian myth and remembering that we are dealing with dead wood, Ron will announce that he is a distant cousin to the One True Cross.  

How Many More Times?

December 2, 2016

Valuation of Medals

December 2, 2016

Mnay thanks – I agree that valuations are subjective. recently Nobel Prize Medals have increased sharply in value. For example, Watson ($4.76 million), Crick Estate (about $2.00 million), Lederman $765,000 and two Peace Prize medals respectively at $661,000 and $1.16 million. The work of Civil List Pensioners such as myself is also becoming very valuable, both in literature and science.”

All that you are doing, Ron, is highlighting the fact that you are not in the same league as the other Civil List pensioners and, indeed, should never have been put on the list in the first place. As for Nobel Medals, we cannot even persuade them to give you an Ig-Nobel Prize … because you cannot get  your nonsense-physics published in real journals. You have already tried to auction your medals and scrap-paper, and have failed miserably … twice. Nobody knows who you are in the real scientific world, and you have accomplished nothing but undermine the symbolic value of the Civil-List Pension.

Tyros

December 2, 2016

Many thanks to Dave Burleigh

December 2, 2016

To Dave Burleigh, CEO ,Annexa Inc. Arizona, USA:

Many thanks! This is very useful and I am forwarding to Osamu Ide. Considering the disastrous state of energy policy there is no time to lose in the development of ES power stations.”

You claim to be energy-from-spacetime (perpetual-motion) inventors, and yet you have never heard of Dr Steven Greer before? Of course, he is only a medic and therefore probably does not possess a doctoral degree. He is also more interested in little green men than in little yellow men.

No-Way Back

December 1, 2016

“The archiving of the two sites, www.aias.us and www.upitec.org, is of key importance. They are on the wayback machine, www.archive.org , and www.aias.us is on www.webarchive.org.uk up to Sept. 2015. The latter site is currently being upgraded to use wayback machine software, as explained some time ago by Aled Betts at the National Library of Wales. The wayback machine archives in real time, and the British copyright library archives will also archive in real time in due course, using wayback machine software. Both sites, www.aias.us and www.upitec.org, will be featured as sites of international importance in culture and science. The www.aias.us site was made visible on the wayback machine by Dave Burleigh earlier this year (2016).”

You do realize, we hope, Ron that the Wayback Machine samples everything automatically; a site does not have to be ‘made visible’, it is a matter of routine. The sampling is also pretty sketchy and the pages are incomplete in various ways. Our blog is also covered by the Wayback Machine, so stop trying to pretend that its archiving is some great honour which has been personally bestowed upon you. Because the coverage is so incomplete, we are pleased that more complete records of your lunatic pronouncements are being preserved elsewhere: every ‘gem of wisdom’ from you will turn into a thorn in your side.