Sewage Onboard

Discussion of 367(8): Complete Theory of the Gyroscope

January 14, 2017

Many thanks again, the gyroscope would be pulled upwards by its own spin, as we see in a spinning top, and this can be helped by a torque or force, or by spacetime itself in ECE2 fluid dynamics. So a gyro in a vehicle would tend to pull it up as you infer, but there is also the weight of the gyro to consider. So an extra torque is needed. Michael Jackson made such a device at home. The constants of motion and other information needed to simplify Eq. (25) are given in UFT270, with incisive graphics by Horst. For example the second term becomes L squared cos theta / (m squared r cubed), which is the centrifugal acceleration directed opposite to the pull of gravitation. The third term is also directed opposite to the force of gravitation, and is the Coriolis term. Laithwaite and Shipov use extra torques in the analysis.”

We were rather hoping that Sewage and Siemens Stain would jump ship, now that Ron has now so obviously made a fool of himself by ‘explaining’ an ‘effect’ which was only ever a lay fallacy. We were even going to offer an amnesty to them if they immediately resigned from AIAS and repudiated Ron and all of his works. They will now instead feature, prominently it seems, in our friend’s book and copies of it will find their way to Siemens (Munich) and Ceredigion County Council; not to mention various royal societies and the Honours Forfeiture Committee.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Sewage Onboard”

  1. GwasArglwyddauGwyraGlyntawe Says:

    Please put out an appeal for funding this “book” you keep on about. How can we give donations to speed up its publication with all the promised revelations. Many of us would willingly contribute to expose these charlatans of pseudo science particularly the so called self styled “Uchelwr”.

    • crackpotwatch Says:

      It does not require funding. Publication is all under control. You will appreciate that, in order to undermine people who appear to be experts in the public’s eye (and Ron is really just collateral damage), the writer has to simplify many complicated concepts. The debunking also has to be scrupulously accurate because one single error of fact will be used by victims (which include NASA, British Aerospace, several universities and a still-living ‘grand old man of British aviation’) in order to try to dismiss the entire book. The writer also tends to be ‘sharp-penned’ and so litigation has to be avoided; he was threatened with a £50000 law suit very early in the project. He also writes for and edits several journals, so his time is not his own. Patience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: