March 24, 2017
I was introduced to Horst Eckardt by Lar Felker, the author of “The Evans Equations of Unified Field Theory” ”
That would be Mr Felker, the great physics genius, who – for some reason – applies himself professionally only to the age-old problem of air-conditioning.
“and discussions took place in the Patti Room of Craig y Nos Castle.”
Presumably on the occasion that TGA gold medals were being handed out to leading pseudoscientists. The medals that you now deride.
“We planned to walk to see a famous bronze age ring work high up on the mountain here, Carn Llechart, but one of the guests found the wind and rain too severe. Bruhn was a fraudster who disappeared in 2008. The standard editors made a thane wall against ECE theory, but being an old Norman on one side, I side stepped them instinctively using Barry John’s “Instructions for the Fly Half”, Appendix 2A, “An Arrow in the Eye”. ”
Bruhn was a mathematician with a particular dislike for pseudoscience. He cut you and your work into little pieces, and left the field triumphant. You should be honored that any of us spend our valuable time pointing out the errors of a nobody. In fact, we do it only for the benefit of others … others who might otherwise think that your degrees and gongs betoken scientific rectitude. They should … but they don’t.
“Gerard ‘t Hooft made a fool of himself by unpublishing the published (these are all classic papers by now). So like the Viking King Cnut, (Canute), his boots filled with the incoming tide of new thought. ”
Professor t’Hooft, the celebrated Nobel Prize winner, quite rightly cleaned up Foundations of Physics Letters after it had fallen into the hands of a crackpot editor who had tried to engineer a paradigm-shift … in the loony direction. But t’Hooft is no Winston Smith: he could not expunge the stain which had been left by you and your troupe. On the bright side, those who can appreciate the joke can still laugh at your explanation of ‘Dr’ Bearden’s perpetual-motion machine. How come you don’t mention that affair any more? Will you eventually drop Ideotic and Hill-of-Beans as well? We would love to know more about the latter. He seems to have no track-record, not even a dirt-track: before going nowhere … he came from nowhere. Still, thanks to the both of you for appearing in that Tesla-worship film; thus taking the shine off the reputation of the overrated Michio Kaku. And stop referring to the Cnut story as if he thought he could stop the advancing tide. That is an old schoolboy howler; not worthy of an historian (LOL).
“Computer algebra is impossible to argue with, and the geometrical proofs of Cartan are self checking. ”
It is childishly easy to argue with. For instance, it could be applied to the old equant model for explaining planetary orbits and not detect any error. On the other hand, the equant model can come up with square orbits and sharp corners! Even a complete layman might spot that departure from known astronomical observations. Here is a simple analogy for you: your poetry is embarrassing … but can a spell-checking program detect that? On the other hand, there are programs which can detect excessive ‘wordiness’, tautology and pleonasms in a piece of text.
“Bruhn was always afraid of attacking Carroll, who uses exactly the same geometry. When I started to use the geometry it mysteriously became dubious. This is a clear sign of academic fraud that anyone can see through. Carroll wrote to John B Hart accepting ECE theory, and that was covered up, such an embarrasment. Meticulous proof after proof destroyed Bruhn’s credibility entirely. ”
Bruhn did not need to attack Carroll, since Carroll made no mistake. Instead it was left to you to attack Carroll when certain chapters of his book did not agree with your conclusions.
Anybody can see who the academic fraudster is here. Without seeing that letter, who knows what Carroll actually said; you do not have a reputation for accurate reporting or interpretation. Where are these ‘meticulous’ proofs? Oh, do you mean those paraphrasings, of the same old mistakes, which appeared in low-grade sources?
“Lakhtakia was a joke. ”
Before or after he worked with you?
“By now these proofs are all classics (e.g. UFT 88, 99, Notes from UFT99, UFT109, UFT255, UFT313 and UFT354). Bruhn e mailed everyone in the world, and was an early troll, he attempted to e mail the Devil, and his circuits caught fire. Wikipedia was a fit up and was an early example of academic trolling. The referrals analysis shows that Wiki has been completely ignored for a decade. One wheel on my wagon, I’m still trolling along. Manic troll sites are difficult to see with an electron microscope, so pathetic is their impact (referrals analysis again). ”
Just wait until the academic world hears about you. Then you might have some real scientometrics to report.
“Gareth quotes from my sonnet sequence “False Philosopher’s Fall” in the attached. It was first published in “The Salmon”, Galway, Ireland. I read a copy there and also bought a copy of “Tain Bo Cuailgne”, “Taking the Cattle of Cuailgne”, the Irish language classic, known as “The Cattle Raid of Cuailgne”. It was illustrated in pen and ink. ”
There is no accounting for taste, as they say.
“Galway and Clare were very beautiful, and I hope they have not been turbined to pieces. County Clare was named after another Norman, my direct ancestor Richard Fitz Gilbert de Clare, Strongbow, an armoured skinhead, probably illiterate. The Irish civilized the Normans and taught them their language. Neither the Normans nor the Vikings nor the English had any right to invade Ireland. So there are Darcy’s and Fitzgeralds and so on in Ireland. One of them, Garret Fitzgerald became Taoiseach and I met him at Trinity College Dublin.:”
Is that where your thuggish behavior comes from?
Oops! Almost forgot. Woof woof. Good doggies, Sewage and Beans. Give ’em a biscuit, Ron.