(Sort of) Craigcefnparc News

Now Ron is even being ‘ticked off’ by his ‘ticked-off’ friends,

Dear Mr. Myron Evans,
It seems to me that, by association, the Quantum Antigravity Hypothesis is now on the Crackpot Watch blog :
The Quantum Antigravity Hypothesisis is no pseudoscience, because it is based on both, established accepted theories and physical effects, and also makes empirically testable predictions that we are presently in the process of experimental testing :
Pardon me, but just because we communicate within this closed private email group, it does not follow that anybody in this group, including you, has any right to freely announce any correspondence from this group to the entire World, like you have been doing via your blog, without ever asking for any permission.
Effective immediately, I ask you to stop posting any of my, or Siggi’s, correspondence on your blog, nor to disseminate any of it to any third parties under no condition.
Also, please remove both, my and Siggi’s email addresses from all your mailing lists.
Thank you.
Dr. Agatha Lorentz-Ferenstein, Ph.D.
 You know, Aggie, Evans is a serial offender in this regard: just have a look at this,
https://crackpotwatch.wordpress.com/2013/11/01/doh/
Nevertheless, the weighing of spinning-tops is pure pseudoscience; ask a physicist about it, rather than an electrical engineer.
Advertisements

6 Responses to “(Sort of) Craigcefnparc News”

  1. quantumantigravity Says:

    Crackpot Watch wrote : ” Nevertheless, the weighing of spinning-tops is pure pseudoscience; ask a physicist about it, rather than an electrical engineer. ”

    I do not have to ask a physicist, or anybody else, in order to know that the weighing of spinning-tops is pure pseudoscience. :))

    And that is the reason that I have never been weighing any spinning-tops.

    And I am not going to !! :))

    In case you have not noticed, we are in the process of performing TWO Nobel Prize winning experiments :

    https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/

    which have nothing to do with weighing spinning-tops.

    Next time, before you tell us what is that we are allegedly doing, it would be more honest and professional to quote from our website :

    https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/study-guide/

    • crackpotwatch Says:

      All that we can see are spinning-tops, except that you keep calling them gyroscopes. The spinning-top has been around for millennia. The gyroscope has been around for just over 200 years. They are not the same thing! In any case, you should be looking for a change in mass, not weight. ‘Weight’ is just the reaction-force against the supporting surface, and that can have several components; including stick-slip phenomena within the weighing device itself. It is a universal dilemma: to prove the existence of a small effect, one has to guard against smaller and smaller sources of artefact. Don’t forget that mere rotation can create a magnetic field. Don’t forget that the spinning-top could interact with the Faraday cage that was supposed to be ‘shielding’ it. Given that it took decades, experts and millions of dollars, to detect (Gravity B experiment) subtle gravitational interactions, what chance do a bunch of amateurs have?

  2. quantumantigravity Says:

    crackpotwatch Says: ” All that we can see are spinning-tops ”

    Well, it is not our problem. Go to your optometrist for an eye exam.

    It is not our problem that you don’t want to read anything on our website, and only want to watch photos. It would be more honest and professional to quote from our website :

    https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/

    crackpotwatch Says: ” Given that it took decades, experts and millions of dollars, to detect (Gravity B experiment) subtle gravitational interactions, what chance do a bunch of amateurs have? ”

    What chance do a bunch of those amateurs have? If you want to know, you have to ask them, because I have nothing to do with Ron the Crackpot Grandpa and all the free energy in his Liquid-chocolate-milk-spacetime.

    • crackpotwatch Says:

      You are clearly ignorant of both physics and engineering if you cannot spot the difference between a spinning-top and a gyroscope … or perhaps you get all of your knowledge from the Internet; that growing well-of-ignorance. By the way, that first image (in your Loony Levitators comment) is post-war (as are the concepts of ‘flying saucer’ and ‘UFO’) and has been identified as showing part of a chick-incubator. You are the amateurs referred-to. By the way, the Biefeld-Brown effect is also nonsense. He was not even the first loony to misinterpret the Faraday-wind effect: an Irish crackpot got there first, but everyone but us has forgotten about him. This exchange is at an end; you refuse to be educated. But DO call back when you have your Nobel Prize L O L

  3. IoanRichard Says:

    This below is why some of us chose to use the excellent Crackpotwatch Blog to answer Evans many defamatory deluded comments of Mr Myron Evans. His Science Fiction Blog refuses to accept comments or responses – read below his standard answer :-

    ” : host lmtp.mail.aol.com[10.96.116.225] said: 554 5.7.1 Your mail could not be delivered because the recipient is only accepting mail from specific email addresses. If you feel you received this in error,please contact the recipient directly and ask them to check their email settings. (in reply to end of DATA command)”
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> END.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: