Open House

Description of Stats

August 10, 2017

This is a good idea, and I agree about the password protection to prevent link spamming.”

Don’t bother on our account. The mole in your organization gives us the passwords. What, for example, did pornogig.com (108 references) find of interest chez toi?

Advertisements

8 Responses to “Open House”

  1. Harry Hab Says:

    How does that work, anyway? Is there an affinity between Ron and porn (perversity seeking out depravity) or is it just bots randomly jumping URLs, and the web being what it is, the previous site often simply being porn by statistical preponderance? If the latter, almost all of these data must be discarded as meaningless noise. Sure, there’s a tiny signal in that there noise: a handful of academics stopping by for a laugh.

    • crackpotwatch Says:

      That is the point; it is essentially all random noise. When we have time, we shall go through the 951 pages and report any academic referrals. The last time, we found only two: Journal of Nuclear Physics and New Scientist. However, JNP is a crank publication run by the LENR conman Rossi, and NS is by far the worst science magazine in the world. Incidentally, we have far more respect for that chemistry professor in Manchester – who became a porn star – than we do for a pseudoscientist like Ron. One does not foul ones own nest!

  2. Interested Observer Says:

    I say, it’s rather busy round here, given that this site allegedly attracts ‘zero traffic’, isn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: