And Why Wouldn’t There Be?

August 19, 2017

Large Spike of Interest on the Blog Yesterday

August 19, 2017

There was a large spike of international interest in the blog of www.aias.us yesterday.”

After all, it is not every day that a bunch of self-styled geniuses conspires to deceive the awarding committee of a prestigious prize (which the nutters have absolutely no chance of winning) and then openly discusses the deception in full view of the world! In fact, ‘the world’ would not normally notice, but some spoilsport had been sending out invitations to interested parties. How much longer can it be before Ron ‘has his collar felt’ by the Honours Forfeiture Committee? 

You Spoil Us!

August 18, 2017

Wolf letter draft from Prof. Stephen Bannister

August 18, 2017

This is a powerful support letter from economist Stephen Bannister, and I am most grateful for it. The Wolf Prize Committee is obligated to judge fairly on the facts, and must judge objectively. A Judge cannot ignore the evidence. Once again, many thanks. GJE can send you his home address in confidence, and it would indeed be useful to have an original signature on departmental notepaper. The other two supporters might care to send original letters and signatures to GJE. This would eliminate any possibility of the nomination being thrown out on a technicality. The judges are standard modellers, it will take a great effort on their part to judge fairly, but if they do not, the physics system collapses. It has already collapsed to all intents and purposes.”

Our author-friend now has more than he ever dreamed of: concrete proof that a professor of economics at a supposedly bona fide US university has bought-into Ron’s pseudoscience and therefore into the concepts of perpetual-motion and antigravity.  That is far from being the only scalp hanging from our friend’s tepee however, and he is becoming increasingly alarmed that, such are the levels of career-wise professional suicide in academia and in high-tech companies, that his readers will think that it is the norm. We are similarly amazed at the mind-boggling stupidity of  Ron’s gang. Even if the entire exercise were not a priori futile, given that the Wolf prize can result only from invited nominations by people of stellar reputation, this bunch of idiots are openly discussing how to conceal their conspiracy to hide the fact that they all belong to the same tightly-knit (but not too tightly wound) gang of isolated nutters. Do they really imagine that the Wolf prize committee is not being kept continuously informed of their nefarious activities and of Ron’s fondness for anti-semitic shock-jocks. Ron even imagines that Sewage’s home address is a big secret. That, in itself, is hilarious (how are things over at SA44?). Oh, the judges will know how to judge; who knows, they might even send a letter of complaint to your boss. And what if some mean-spirited person were to forward Dismal’s letter straight back to his HOD (cc Physics Dept. Utah U.)?

That Letter in Full

August 17, 2017

Wolf Prize Letter of Support from UPITEC President Dr. Horst Eckardt

August 17, 2017

Many thanks indeed for this letter of support. The letter of support from Dr. Doug Lindstrom has arrived, and when the letter from Dr. Steve Bannister arrives, the material can be collected and ordered, and submitted by the Nominator, Dr. Gareth Evans, by e mail to the Wolf Foundation. It consists of the material for the nomination form, three support letters and the support letter from Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe rolled over from a previous Wolf Prize nomination. All these nominations are recorded in Marquis Who’s Who, and have established ECE theory as the mainstream physics of the ECE School of Thought. At the 1927 Solvay Conference, physics split into two the Copenhagen and Einstein de Broglie Schools of Thought. The latter has developed into the ECE School of Thought. The Standard Model has remained essentially stagnant since 1927, surprising as this may seem. All the major advances of the past fifteen years have been made by the ECE School of Thought – van der Merwe’s post Einsteinian paradigm shift.

SupportHorstEckardt.docx

Many of you will have been disappointed, nay devastated, to find that the above document was as corrupted as the group itself. However, using some secret homemade software tools, our IT expert has been able to recover the contents: 

Letter of Support for 2018 Wolf Prizes Ô

From Dr. Horst Eckardt

To The Wolf Foundation.

Prof. Evans has made may outstanding contributions to theoretical chemistry and physics. I have worked with him since 2005 and during that time we have produced nearly four hundred papers and books. I have made several fundamental contributions myself, in co-authorship with Prof. Evans and Dr. Douglas Lindstrom. Prof Evans has forged a new understanding of the generally covariant structure of atoms and elementary particles on aias.us and upitec.org., an achievement that is unique and original. I have carefully checked all his calculations, and have used computer algebra and graphics to develop the work. It is therefore highly accurate and original. The theory has been applied to many experiments and notably in UFT311, UFT321, UFT364, UFT382 and UFT383 new circuits have been developed, replicated and patented for a new source of energy from spacetime. Prof Evans has unified the four fundamental forces of nature using well known geometry, and has unified quantum mechanics and general relativity. The unified field theory ranges from quantum physics to astronomy and cosmology, forging new and unified explanations for seemingly disparate phenomena, for example the red shift of light and the structure of galaxies. Another example is the derivation of the quantum Hamilton equations, consistently developing the classical Hamilton equations in a wholly original way. Even fluid dynamics, electrodynamics, and classical mechanics have been triply unified. The unified field theory is able to derive the Dirac equation from geometry, the tetrad postulate. The Schroedinger equation is obtained as the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation. The Dirac equation has therefore been made generally covariant, a great advance in understanding made in a relatively simple way. In fact all of Evans work is relatively simple and free of the plethora of adjustables which plague and destroy the standard physics. The work has also forged a new understanding of particle physics and has completely refuted the Einsteinian general relativity. I myself developed many of these refutations in the Section 3 of the UFT papers, using rigorously correct computer algebra at every stage over a decade of detailed work. So I am completely familiar with all aspects of Evans work from about 2005. Before that, the work was recognized with many well known honours and awards. I believe that Prof. Evans will be judged historically as a man far ahead of his time, who suffered the usual tribulations of an original mind. There are now 385 papers on the Einstein Cartan Evans theory, described in all detail by the nominator. Papers by Evans and myself achieve the highest number of views per month per author of any institute or university in the world, and Evans is the most prolific theoretical and chemical physicist in history.

There are many practical applications of the work, probably the most important being the development of new sources of energy such as energy from spacetime and low energy nuclear reactors.

Dr. Horst Eckardt,

President UPITEC, Director AIAS,

אידיוטים!

August 17, 2017

Wolf Prize Letter of Support from UPITEC President Dr. Horst Eckardt

August 17, 2017

Many thanks indeed for this letter of support. The letter of support from Dr. Doug Lindstrom has arrived, and when the letter from Dr. Steve Bannister arrives, the material can be collected and ordered, and submitted by the Nominator, Dr. Gareth Evans, by e mail to the Wolf Foundation. It consists of the material for the nomination form, three support letters and the support letter from Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe rolled over from a previous Wolf Prize nomination. All these nominations are recorded in Marquis Who’s Who, and have established ECE theory as the mainstream physics of the ECE School of Thought. At the 1927 Solvay Conference, physics split into two the Copenhagen and Einstein de Broglie Schools of Thought. The latter has developed into the ECE School of Thought. The Standard Model has remained essentially stagnant since 1927, surprising as this may seem. All the major advances of the past fifteen years have been made by the ECE School of Thought – van der Merwe’s post Einsteinian paradigm shift.”

Well, we all know that you are idiot pseudoscientists, but we thought that you could at least read to grade-1 standard. Can you read this?

General_Information__Nomination_and_Selection

 

‘Invitation’ is quite a big word isn’t it? But what is that little word following it? Do you know that funny little word? And even without that problem, would they even consider someone who had been a guest on this sicko’s show?

But who knows? Shared delusions make for strange bed-fellows: the Israeli PM is best friends with magician Uri Geller. Geller likes to align himself with the Freud family, of which he claims to be a member – even calling himself Geller-Freud in some business ventures. Sigmund Freud of course has the very highest h-index, in spite of having been a numerology-crank, drug-addict and pseudoscientist. Even cuddly urbane Radio-4 star, knight-of-the-realm and MP, Clement Freud, is now known to have been a violent paedophile.

Clowns Not Being Taken Seriously

August 16, 2017

FOR POSTING: Refusal of Authors to Give Permission to Stephen Crothers

August 16, 2017

This petulant and grossly unethical refusal by authors to give Stephen Crothers permission to reproduce figures in volume two of Principles of ECE is a pathetic and intellectually dishonest effort at censorship. In nearly fifty years as a professional I have never seen such an ugly incident before. It is petulant because they cannot answer numerous devastating criticisms by co author Stephen Crothers and by Professor Robitaille, who has shown that big bang and black hole theory violate the zero’th, first and second laws of thermodynamics. ”

The problem is that they have done so only to their own satisfaction. They play successfully to the gallery of lunatic fringers and anti-science laymen, but would not last five minutes among real experts.  But they do not need to be complete wastes of space. We think that, rather than ignoring them, their theories should be given to undergraduates as ‘homework exercises’  … to poke holes in. Mathematics professors used to do that with ‘proofs’ of angle-trisection which they had received.  

“Today’s scientometrics show that the ECE theory is sweeping the world of science. ”

Hmmm, strange that. Strange that the only ‘proof’ of such success conveniently originates from your own computer.

“I strongly recommend that Stephen’s work be read in ECE2. Its preliminary version is UFT366, excellently collated by Horst Eckardt. I also recommend Steve’s chapter in UFT350 and in the publications section, volume one of “Principles of ECE”. ”

Yes, good homework exercise.

“The attached document on eighty three refutations of Einsteinian general relativity (EGR) is being read regularly around the world. ”

No it isn’t.

“So EGR is completely riddled with errors and is as obsolete as yesterday’s melted snow. ”

EGR has passed every experimental and observational test with flying colours.

“I have also witnessed Steve being subjected to a vicious verbal common assault by a senior level academic, and to the usual disinformation and defamation by wikipedia. The latter has committed a criminal offence under the malicious communications act by using the language of the gutter. It is a criminal offence to send grossly offensive communications. ”

He deserves worse.

“It seems that a great majority of scientists are starting to reject the standard physics. ”

Only ‘starting’? It was ‘sweeping’ before! But given that ‘standard physics’ has never heard of you, both statements are untrue.

“Those who respond with abuse and censorship are finished. ”

That might be true if they addressed fellow scientists in that way. But you are not fellow scientists. You are beyond the pale. You would have been heckling drunks at one of Faraday’s lectures. Mindless contrarians are, like the poor, ‘always with us’.

“I recommend that Steve describe the figures in words, or redraw them so they do not violate copyright. Strenuous efforts were of course made to censor “Principles of ECE”, which has been read many tens of thousands of times in a couple of years, entirely without criticism . One cannot stop the march of ideas (Victor Hugo). There is a new generation of scientists which demands recognition and intellectual honesty”

Nobody reads your books apart from the few reviewers … who pan them.

World Record Liar

August 14, 2017

FOR POSTING: World Records

August 14, 2017

I hold at least three individual world records as follows:

1) Number of prestigious Fellowships won in open international competition. They are listed in the attached CV. Normally, only one of these is needed for tenure as a lecturer. I won fourteen in all, and was kindly made Honorary Fellow of the University of London, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, and the University of Lancaster. This record is never likely to be broken.”

As you say, just one is usually enough. What happened? Did you ‘look good on paper’ and ‘give good interview’ , only for people to find out what you are actually like? Or was your CV padded with lies even then, just as it is now:

http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/about-us/ourpeople/honorary-fellowships/

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/srs/governance-and-committees/committees/hdfc/honorary-fellows/#e

https://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/alumni/ouralumni/honorarygraduatesandfellows.aspx

“2) Youngest recipient under modern rules of the D. Sc. degree (Scientiae Doctor), by a margin of about a decade. This record is never likely to be broken. The Degree is earned for internationally recognized contributions to science. I submitted the Thesis when I was twenty six years old. Under modern rules I had to wait for two years to pass since earning my Ph. D. when I was twenty four. I am now over eighteen.”

We think that this was a desperate ploy to get rid of you. Was Aberystwyth as corrupt/incompetent then as you say that it is now? By the way, why does the ‘Opera Omni’ cite two different D.Sc theses and why does it seem that neither of them has ever been cited?

“3) The most prolific author in chemical physics, probably of all time.”

The pre-breakdown work was voluminous (as it is for all ‘bacon-slicing’ chemists) but was unremarkable, which makes it all the more baffling that you were recommended for a Civil List pension in the first place. The post-breakdown work is rubbish. Your record of pseudoscientific deceit is never likely to be broken by anyone with a doctorate.

You Cannot Be Serious!

August 14, 2017

Design of Devices with Defined Spacetime or Vacuum Properties

August 14, 2017

We can hope that the design and construction of spacetime power stations will be accelerated by this theoretical understanding. Thanks in particular to Horst Eckardt and Doug Lindstrom, and congratulation to all staff.”

What about the noise pollution? What will such a power station look like? Will it consist of one giant Ideotic Magic Doorbell echoing out like a sort of demented Big Ben? Or will it contain millions of little doorbells on shelves, all twittering away like a battery-farm full of insane chickens? Yes, mention the gang, spread the blame. Don’t forget that certain people may now be monitoring your activities. 

 

Encore une Pièce à Conviction

August 14, 2017

Support Letter from AIAS Director Douglas Lindstrom

August 14, 2017

This is greatly appreciated, Dr. Douglas Lindstrom has a complete knowledge of ECE theory and has independently made several significant theoretical and experimental advances based on ECE theory. He is a graduate of one of the best universities in the world, British Columbia in Canada. I am forwarding this letter to the Nominator, AIAS Co President, Gareth Evans. Many thanks again to all concerned! In past nominations the Wolf Foundation has accepted this format, i .e. letter and original signature sent to the Foundation electronically.”

Well that is going straight into our collection of evidence! It is quite hilarious that these clowns, so caught up in their shared delusion, hand out concrete proof of that delusion. ‘Better to remain silent and let people think that you are stupid, than write a letter … and prove it’. So, in one fell swoop, Lindy openly admits to believing in the scam known as LENR (formerly cold fusion), to believing that Ron is some sort of credible scientist … and to failing to comprehend that the Wolf Prize nominations are invitation-only. He also seems to have forgotten Ron’s recent warning about concealing their affiliation. Lindy’s university must be very proud of him.   

Great News Ron!

August 12, 2017

The hit-counter on our ‘unvisited’ blog has just rolled over to 130,000. This last 1000 took just 1 week and 2 days to accumulate. The previous 1000 had required 1 week and 6 days; as had the 1000 before that. The first 1000 after setting up the hit-counter required 2 weeks and 2 days. Where will it all end?

Read Our (Numerous) Lips

August 10, 2017

Acknowledgments

August 10, 2017

I wish to thank the nominator, Dr Gareth John Evans, and the supporters, Drs. Horst Eckardt, Douglas Lindstrom and Stephen Bannister, for their work towards the Wolf Prizes for 2018. I think that if the Wolf Prize is going to be viewed as objective, it must not be restricted to one school of thought. These are nominations not of myself in particular, but for new science that is making a tremendous impact by any standards. This impact has been measured with great accuracy and prefect objectivity since 2002.”

Sewage cannot nominate you. Nobody whom you know can nominate you. We have corresponded betimes with several Nobelists and scientific knights who could nominate you. But would they? Would they ****!